I am not big on high-five, but i would like to add my +1. I will find
if it does state.
Post by DIEGO LOPEZ GARCIAHi,
As one of the supporters of the idea of not leaving state management out of
scope, I am glad to see Richard's proposal and happy to support the idea of
exploring a solution able to encompass vendor specific approaches.
Be goode,
Martin, Michael,
IPR concerns are valid, but if they are crucial to solve the problem, and
the solution provides higher benefit, they could be addressed, right?
Regarding vendor specific solution, this is a very good point! Please take a
look at approaches such as merge/split. They allow vendor specific packaging
of NF state. Hence, transfers of state can be only among NFs of the same
vendor. The advance, however, is that at least the controller can be
different from the NF vendors. This is a good progress, in my view. Make
sense?
Richard
Post by Michael TuexenPost by Martin StiemerlingHi Richard,
Post by Y. Richard YangHi Martin,
Here is one point. One constraint of the proposed work, in my view, is
that the scope does not consider state management. Most useful NFs are
stateful. Hence, removing state management from the scope is not ideal,
and hence is a limit. There is interesting recent progress in generic,
reusable NF state management, such as Merge/Split
(https://www.usenix.org/system/files/conference/nsdi13/nsdi13-final205.pdf).
If this is included, I believe that the group can develop a lot more
more solutions.
state management is an interesting topic, but there has been explicit
community feedback during the first bof that this is not something the
potential wg should be working on, as this is very vendor specific.
... and there are most likely a lot IPRs... That was one of the reasons
state sharing was excluded from the scope of RSerPool...
Best regards
Michael
Post by Martin StiemerlingMartin
_______________________________________________
vnfpool mailing list
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vnfpool
_______________________________________________
vnfpool mailing list
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vnfpool
--
PLEASE NOTE MY NEW EMAIL ADDRESS
"Esta vez no fallaremos, Doctor Infierno"
Dr Diego R. Lopez
Telefonica I+D
http://people.tid.es/diego.lopez/
Tel: +34 913 129 041
Mobile: +34 682 051 091
----------------------------------
________________________________
Este mensaje y sus adjuntos se dirigen exclusivamente a su destinatario,
puede contener información privilegiada o confidencial y es para uso
exclusivo de la persona o entidad de destino. Si no es usted. el
destinatario indicado, queda notificado de que la lectura, utilización,
divulgación y/o copia sin autorización puede estar prohibida en virtud de la
legislación vigente. Si ha recibido este mensaje por error, le rogamos que
nos lo comunique inmediatamente por esta misma vía y proceda a su
destrucción.
The information contained in this transmission is privileged and
confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or
entity named above. If the reader of this message is not the intended
recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or
copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received
this transmission in error, do not read it. Please immediately reply to the
sender that you have received this communication in error and then delete
it.
Esta mensagem e seus anexos se dirigem exclusivamente ao seu destinatário,
pode conter informação privilegiada ou confidencial e é para uso exclusivo
da pessoa ou entidade de destino. Se não é vossa senhoria o destinatário
indicado, fica notificado de que a leitura, utilização, divulgação e/ou
cópia sem autorização pode estar proibida em virtude da legislação vigente.
Se recebeu esta mensagem por erro, rogamos-lhe que nos o comunique
imediatamente por esta mesma via e proceda a sua destruição
_______________________________________________
vnfpool mailing list
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vnfpool