[vnfpool] VNFPool BoF Session Agenda Posted

[Zongning]

Hi, Folks,

We have posted a VNFPool BoF session agenda:
http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/89/agenda/agenda-89-vnfpool

Note that this is a draft agenda. If anyone would like to request new, or change agenda time, please let us know as soon as you could.

Thanks.


- Melinda and Ning

[Qin Wu]

Hi,
I am aware of IETF agenda update as follows:
"

The following session has been added to the agenda:



**Monday, March 3 - Afternoon Session III 1630 - 1730

Blenheim RAI sipcore Session Initiation Protocol Core



The following sessions have been canceled:



**Tuesday, March 4 - Afternoon Session I 1300 - 1400

Richmond/Chelsea/Tower OPS ipfix IP Flow Information Export - CANCELED



**Wednesday, March 5 - Afternoon Session II 1520 - 1620

Park Suite OPS opsec Operational Security Capabilities for IP Network Infrastructure - CANCELED



The following are changes made to scheduled sessions:



**Monday, March 3 - Afternoon Session I 1300 - 1500

Richmond/Chelsea/Tower OPS netconf Network Configuration

-Moved FROM Wednesday Afternoon Session I 1300-1500



**Wednesday, March 5 - Afternoon Session I 1300 - 1500

Palace C OPS netmod NETCONF Data Modeling Language

-Moved FROM Monday Afternoon Session I 1300-1500

"
Would it possible to consider changing agenda time and avoid conflict with PCE meeting session?

Regards!
-Qin
From: vnfpool [mailto:vnfpool-***@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Zongning
Sent: Sunday, February 16, 2014 1:46 PM
To: ***@ietf.org
Subject: [vnfpool] VNFPool BoF Session Agenda Posted

Hi, Folks,

We have posted a VNFPool BoF session agenda:
http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/89/agenda/agenda-89-vnfpool

Note that this is a draft agenda. If anyone would like to request new, or change agenda time, please let us know as soon as you could.

Thanks.


- Melinda and Ning

[Zongning]

Hi, Qin,

Thank you for raising this issue (again:)).
We did look for possibility of avoiding such conflict with PCE, and actually other conflicts mentioned by other folks before. But we found it is very unlikely to re-schedule, considering the facts including the min. length of our session, new conflicts with other WGs like I2RS if we move, etc. So, we decided to keep the current schedule.
Again, I apologize for any potential conflicts due to our schedule, even it usually happens in IETF week!

-Ning

·¢ŒþÈË: Qin Wu
·¢ËÍʱŒä: 2014Äê2ÔÂ21ÈÕ 8:56
ÊÕŒþÈË: Zongning; ***@ietf.org
Ö÷Ìâ: RE: VNFPool BoF Session Agenda Posted

Hi,
I am aware of IETF agenda update as follows:
¡°

The following session has been added to the agenda:



**Monday, March 3 - Afternoon Session III 1630 - 1730

Blenheim RAI sipcore Session Initiation Protocol Core



The following sessions have been canceled:



**Tuesday, March 4 - Afternoon Session I 1300 - 1400

Richmond/Chelsea/Tower OPS ipfix IP Flow Information Export - CANCELED



**Wednesday, March 5 - Afternoon Session II 1520 - 1620

Park Suite OPS opsec Operational Security Capabilities for IP Network Infrastructure - CANCELED



The following are changes made to scheduled sessions:



**Monday, March 3 - Afternoon Session I 1300 - 1500

Richmond/Chelsea/Tower OPS netconf Network Configuration

-Moved FROM Wednesday Afternoon Session I 1300-1500



**Wednesday, March 5 - Afternoon Session I 1300 - 1500

Palace C OPS netmod NETCONF Data Modeling Language

-Moved FROM Monday Afternoon Session I 1300-1500

¡±
Would it possible to consider changing agenda time and avoid conflict with PCE meeting session?

Regards!
-Qin
From: vnfpool [mailto:vnfpool-***@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Zongning
Sent: Sunday, February 16, 2014 1:46 PM
To: ***@ietf.org<mailto:***@ietf.org>
Subject: [vnfpool] VNFPool BoF Session Agenda Posted

Hi, Folks,

We have posted a VNFPool BoF session agenda:
http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/89/agenda/agenda-89-vnfpool

Note that this is a draft agenda. If anyone would like to request new, or change agenda time, please let us know as soon as you could.

Thanks.


- Melinda and Ning